https://www.designweek.co.uk/issues/04-september-8-september-2023/fairphone-5-above/ Tue, 05 Sep 2023 15:13:27 +0000 hourly 1 https://www.designweek.co.uk/issues/04-september-8-september-2023/fairphone-5-above/comment-page-1/#comment-182104 Tue, 05 Sep 2023 15:13:27 +0000 https://www.designweek.co.uk/?p=296092#comment-182104 A “more gender neutral expression” in mobile phone design? Is this seriously being promoted as a feature of the device?

]]> https://www.designweek.co.uk/issues/04-september-8-september-2023/fairphone-5-above/comment-page-1/#comment-182095 Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:14:31 +0000 https://www.designweek.co.uk/?p=296092#comment-182095 As someone looking to drive sustainable design forward, this is a fantastic case study. I hadn’t heard of ARM, TIF or FCA but will be looking into them.

]]> https://www.designweek.co.uk/issues/04-september-8-september-2023/fairphone-5-above/comment-page-1/#comment-182093 Tue, 05 Sep 2023 07:08:35 +0000 https://www.designweek.co.uk/?p=296092#comment-182093 Excuse my ignorance but could you explain what is gender specific about a smart phone or even gender-neutral. I read the headline then looked for some guidance in the copy and could not find any explanation. Not an issue I was aware of.

]]>